A common answer on 'why take the CPF test' is 'for yourself', 'recognision among peers' and those alone are just not doing it for me.
Those are $1 answers to a $10 question. For most of us, the whole answer is more complicated than that. Over the years I have had the pleasure of talking to a lot of framers about why the CPF program appeals to them, or not. Perceptions vary widely, and so do framers' motivations.
About 60% of framers who decide to earn the CPF designation study seriously and succeed on their first try, but about 40% of first-time candidates fail. Those who then decide to study, learn sincerely, and come back for another try usually succeed. Unfortunately, some who fail become bitter and resentful detractors of the program.
Although, I must admit, with people failing the test, I see it more as a challenge to take it...just to proof myself.
Personal validation can be a powerful motivator, but please understand that a lifetime of typical retail framing would teach very little about preservation, which is not intuitive, and
that is mostly what the CPF exam tests. Those who only want to prove they already know enough about framing probably comprise most of the 40% noted above. They miss the point of the program, in my opinion.
Framers who embrace the notion of learning and progressing do well in the CPF exam, and increasing numbers are going for the MCPF, as well. They realize that the body of framing knowledge continues to expand infinitely, and that it is available to them. Education can become an endless quest for some, as the CPF and MCPF programs only open the door to ongoing programs. Learning is an infinite process, not a finite goal, and it has almost nothing to do with getting letters after one's name to impress others.
"The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of wonder" was Ralph W. Sockman's way of saying that the more we learn, the more we thirst to learn more. Every answer brings up new questions.